Saturday, February 6, 2021

2 ex-justices score Parlade anew at SC. Inquirer Newsletter. February 7, 2021.

ROOTS OF PIETY A Mass held at the Manila Cathedral on Saturday marks the 442nd anniversary of Manila’s elevation as a Catholic diocese in 1579. The service also launches a series of activities commemorating the arrival of Christianity in the country 500 years ago. Presiding over the Mass are Manila Bishop Broderick Pabillo (right) and apostolic nuncio to the Philippines Archbishop Charles Brown. —MARIANNE BERMUDEZ

News

Angkas founder revs up for brighter future

It was supposed to be just an app-based business to help Metro Manila’s weary commuters. But George Royeca’s pioneering idea has taken a life of its own.

News

Convicted fraudster won’t give password

German prosecutors have confiscated more than $60 million worth of bitcoin from a fraudster. But they can’t unlock the money because he won’t give them the password.

Newsletter / Join us

Has this been forwarded by a friend? Subscribe now to the Philippine Daily Inquirer Newsletter and get your latest news and important updates on COVID-19.

Start listening

Banner Story

2 ex-justices score Parlade anew at SC

By Marlon Ramos

Retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio and former Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales have cited another serious threat against civil rights from an Army general who had anchored it this time on the assailed antiterror law.

In a four-page manifestation to the Supreme Court on Friday, Carpio, Morales and other lawyers who had joined them in a petition challenging the constitutionality of the antiterror law said that Lt. Gen. Antonio Parlade Jr. had made “clear threats” against press freedom enshrined in the Bill of Rights when he branded a journalist a rebel propagandist.

They said Parlade’s suggestion that Inquirer.net reporter Tetch Torres-Tupas may be liable for “aiding the terrorists by spreading lies” for reporting on allegations of illegal arrest and torture made by two men against soldiers posed a grave danger as the offense carried the penalty of life imprisonment.

“[T]he threats’ obvious invasion of protected expressive rights is possible only because the language of the [antiterror law] is vague and overbroad, casting a wide net of possibilities,” according to their manifestation.

“Such direct threats engender fear that chills journalists or even citizens from exercising their rights to freedom of expression and freedom of the press,” it said.

Parlade did not respond to the Inquirer’s text message requesting comment.

Carpio and his group filed one of the 37 petitions assailing Republic Act No. 11479, or the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, in the high court.

Aetas’ petition

On Tuesday, on the same day that the court opened oral arguments on the antiterror law, Tupas reported that two Aeta men—Japer Gurung and Junior Ramos—filed their own petition against it.

In their petition, the two men told the high tribunal that they were illegally arrested in August last year in Zambales province and tortured by soldiers who made Gurung eat his own feces as they forced him to admit that he was a member of the New People’s Army.

The field commander of the Army unit involved said the two men’s allegations had not been proven, according to Armed Forces of the Philippines spokesperson Maj. Gen. Edgard Arevalo.

On Wednesday, Parlade, chief of the military’s Southern Luzon Command and spokesperson for the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict, attacked Tupas on his Facebook page, saying she did not check whether her report was “true or fake” and called her a “propagandista.”

‘Spreading lies’

In response to a comment on his post, he said it would be “possible” to charge her with “aiding terrorists by spreading lies” in her report.

Parlade, however, erroneously believed that Tupas based her article on reports from the US-based Human Rights Watch and media group Kodao, which he both accused as being “propaganda machines” of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP). In fact, her report was based on the two men’s narration of their experience after their arrest and alleged torture.

Associate Justice Marvic Leonen even cited that incident as the possible “actual case” that the high court should discuss in determining the constitutionality of the antiterror law.

Parlade also wrongly stated that the Army unit that the two men had blamed for their ordeal, the 73rd Division Reconnaissance Company (DRC), was in Davao.

The 7th Infantry Division under which the unit operated had confirmed in its Facebook page that the 73rd DRC was in Zambales at the time.

It was the second time that Carpio and Morales, who is also a retired magistrate, had reported threats from Parlade to the Supreme Court.

On Jan. 25, Carpio and his fellow petitioners brought a similar manifestation, calling the 15-member tribunal’s attention to the Army general’s threatening messages against those seeking to invalidate the antiterror law.

On Jan. 16, Parlade wrote on his Facebook page that the public should be “watchful of these individuals, groups and organizations opposing a law that will protect our citizens from terrorists.”

He warned opponents of the law that the “Day of Judgment is upon you and the Filipino people, who have suffered enough from the malignant hands of the (CPP), of which you are a part of (sic), sit in judgment.”

“Very soon, blood debts will be settled. The long arm of the law will catch up on you and your supporters,” he said.

OSG explanation sought

Carpio and his group told the Supreme Court Parlade’s threats were “a matter of serious concern that requires judicial remedy.” They urged the magistrates to compel the Office of the Solicitor General to explain Parlade’s action.

“Designed to intimidate ... (Parlade’s) post also amounts to interference with the honorable court’s power to administer justice as it is directed to the parties and their counsel days before the matter is heard by the honorable court,” they said.

Sen. Panfilo Lacson, the main author of the antiterror law, had also castigated Parlade for making “careless and insensitive” remarks that undermine support for the law.

“At a time unity is needed against threats such as terrorism, actions that threaten to divide are the last thing our country needs,” he said.

Editorial

Worrying new variants

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has even mutated into three variants: the UK variant (B.1.1.7), the South Africa variant (B.1.351), and the Brazil variant (P.1 and P.2). While the World Health Organization has said there is no evidence yet that these variants are deadlier than the original novel coronavirus strain, a
cause for worry is that 'they tend to spread faster, they’re more transmissible or more infectious.' The Philippines has already reported 25 cases of the UK variant as of Feb. 5, with the first case—a businessman who came from Dubai—announced by the Department of Health last Jan. 13.

While Filipinos await getting their vaccination against COVID-19, measures that have so far kept people protected such as wearing face mask, hand-washing, and maintaining physical distance should be even more mandatory. Vigilance and care are paramount, say experts, especially now that the virus has mutated into variants that spread more easily. '…[I]f you now go to the store two or three times a week, cut back to just once a week," advised a New York Times commentary published last Jan. 19. 'If you’ve been spending 30 to 45 minutes in the grocery store, cut your time down to 15 or 20 minutes. If the store is crowded, come back later. If you’re waiting in line, be mindful of staying at least six feet apart from the people ahead of you and behind you.' The virus remains out there, and it's shape-shifting fast.

Read full story: opinion.inquirer.net