OH, DEERE: John Deere has alerted equipment owners that they could seek repair services of their own choosing after the Environmental Protection Agency said the company was potentially violating the Clean Air Act by restricting repair of its products’ emissions systems, Marcia reports this morning. “EPA informed John Deere that EPA believed that a number of their products did not conform to EPA regulations with regard to their emissions warranty statement,” EPA spokesperson Remmington Belford confirmed in an email. EPA Administrator Michael Regan previously said that the CAA does not prohibit who can repair emissions systems, despite some manufacturers blaming the environmental rules for restricting equipment owners from seeking repair services outside of authorized manufacturer repair shops. The EPA declined to say when it alerted Deere to the potential violation or how many products were involved. The company appears to have mailed letters to equipment owners earlier this year. PFAS IN PESTICIDES: The EPA allegedly failed to report PFAS detected in pesticides samples sent to the agency for testing, according to a complaint filed last week by watchdog group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). EPA tests all pesticides prior to registration due to the known environmental impact of PFAS when used in pesticides and agriculture, according to the agency’s website. PEER’s formal complaint demands that the EPA retract a May 2023 research memo and press release where it stated that PFAS were not found in tested pesticide products. EPA did not report “high PFAS concentrations” found in those samples, which were deliberately spiked with PFAS as a “common quality control technique,” according to Kyla Bennett, PEER’s director of science policy. “They made up all sorts of excuses about why they shouldn't have to report that, but we went through the results with a fine-tooth comb,” Bennett told MA. Response: Because the issue is “pending litigation,” EPA declined to comment to MA on the PEER report. Next steps: Bennett tells MA the ultimate goal of the complaint was to publicize concerns about PFAS to farmers and consumers. “If I had faith in EPA, I would say that scientists would look at this and go, ‘Yeah, we shouldn't have done this,’ and retract the memo,” Bennett said. “But I do not have high hopes that they will.”
|
No comments:
Post a Comment