PDAB LAWSUIT BUILDS ON GENERIC FIGHT — The first lawsuit targeting a state agency’s power to cap what it pays insurers for certain expensive brand-name drugs seems to have taken a cue from challenges filed by generic drugmakers and their advocates against price-gouging laws in other states. Amgen, the maker of autoimmune drug Enbrel, sued Colorado’s Prescription Drug Affordability Board last week after the agency decided the medication is “unaffordable” for the state’s patients. The company’s suit argues that the law underpinning the board’s authority is unconstitutional, preempts federal patent law and undermines interstate commerce. Background: Some state PDABs have the power to set an upper payment limit for certain pricy drugs — authority that observers say could help the agencies withstand legal scrutiny since the focus is on what insurers in the state pay for medications instead of what manufacturers charge. “It is a limit on payment, not on drug prices,” Hemi Tewarson, executive director of the National Academy for State Health Policy, said. “That’s just a key distinction.” In other states: Seven states have established similar boards in recent years to try to contain costs for state-funded entitlement programs and state residents. Some states have also passed price-gouging laws, covering certain generic drugs sold within their borders amid concerns about spiking costs for medications generally expected to be cheaper than their name-brand counterparts. A federal appeals court in 2018 overturned Maryland’s price-gouging law, and the Association for Accessible Medicines, a trade group for generic and biosimilar drugmakers and distributors, has challenged similar statutes in Illinois and Minnesota, with a judge blocking the latter state from enforcing its law in December. “Industry is trying to find ways to build on some of the success it’s had,” said Zach Baron, director of Georgetown Law's Health Policy and the Law Initiative. An Amgen spokesperson said there’s “no legal basis for the Board’s actions or haphazard process throughout the review period” for Enbrel, adding the company is “committed” to helping patients afford the drug. Lessons learned? Still, the affordability boards take a different approach to mitigating drug costs than the price-gouging laws, and their structure could shield them from the “pitfalls” Maryland experienced, said Robin Feldman, a professor at UC Law San Francisco. “The states have learned from the Maryland decision,” she said. IT’S FRIDAY. WELCOME BACK TO PRESCRIPTION PULSE. What are your solar eclipse plans? Send news and tips to Lauren Gardner (lgardner@politico.com or @Gardner_LM) or David Lim (dlim@politico.com or @davidalim).
|
No comments:
Post a Comment