Congress isn’t keen on creating a real-world version of “Snowpiercer,” the sci-fi classic where humans fire aerosols into the atmosphere to counteract climate change. The White House said such geoengineering was a “possibility” worth studying in a recent report — mandated by Congress — that came out with zero fanfare before the July Fourth weekend. But Emma Dumain and Corbin Hiar found little enthusiasm among lawmakers for monkeying with the atmosphere, especially as a substitute for reducing carbon pollution. "Why try a complicated and potentially dangerous solution when we have the obvious one right in front of us?" asked Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.). The backstory: The idea of geoengineering has kicked around science and policy circles for years, but language from former Rep. Jerry McNerney (D-Calif.) in a 2022 spending bill forced the White House to weigh in. McNerney, who retired in January, said most members of Congress aren’t educated enough to consider what could be a last-ditch solution to stem the warming of the Earth. “If we just put our heads in the sand," he said, "we may not have any means to prevent catastrophe if it’s looming.” McNerney was turned on to geoengineering years ago by SilverLining, a group that advocates for research on what it calls “emergency medicine” for the climate. That includes harnessing particles in the atmosphere to reflect back sunlight. Hold up: The group’s leader, Kelly Wanser, says she knows geoengineering has risks. (Spoiler alert: “Snowpiercer” takes place in an apocalyptic ice age.) That’s why she wants Congress to study it. And that’s about as far as lawmakers are ready to go — if they’ll discuss geoengineering at all. California Rep. Zoe Lofgren, the top Democrat on the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, told Emma and Corbin she worries about “catastrophic” outcomes from tinkering with the planet. The committee’s chair, Rep. Frank Lucas (R-Okla.), said he hasn’t even seen the White House report. Many climate advocates oppose the idea. Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) introduced climate legislation last year that would have barred federal spending on geoengineering. Even the White House report said that “there are no plans underway” for a geoengineering research program. But Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) warned against failing to prepare for technology that other countries may embrace. “If we haven’t done the research to determine what are the consequences of doing this,” he said, “then we can’t really complain if someone else does this research and decides to do something.”
|
No comments:
Post a Comment