VULNERABLE DEMS HOLD THE LINE, MOSTLY: Some vulnerable Democrats up for reelection flatly rejected the House GOP’s plans to expand SNAP work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents, Meredith reports. Context: The House-passed Limit, Save, Grow Act would expand the age limit for able-bodied adults without dependents to 55 from 49 in exchange for raising the debt ceiling. It passed largely along party lines last week, in a bid by Speaker Kevin McCarthy to bring President Joe Biden and the Senate to the negotiating table. Those adults are subject to more stringent work requirements than the general SNAP population. Sens. Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania are being targeted in their swing states by Republicans aiming to flip the Senate. But each of them said they would oppose the GOP’s plans. “They just want to deny people help,” Brown said in an interview. “I guess they think it’s good politics, even though it’s not.” Casey said it is “cruel” and that he plans “to fight like hell to stop it.” Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.), who is up for reelection in 2026, was more blunt. “That option has no future,” Smith said. House Republicans “are barking up the wrong tree.” Some Democrats have been more muted, including Jon Tester (Mont.), who said: “We have work requirements,” but also that he has to “look at the [GOP] plan.” Independent Sen. Angus King (Maine), who caucuses with Democrats, said SNAP work requirements “have always been there” and that they’re set to return in July after a pandemic pause. West Virginia centrist Joe Manchin (D), meanwhile, has signaled he could be open to the plan. When asked about the GOP plans to expand current work requirements for food aid, he replied that he supports work requirements for people “when they’re capable and able to do it.” More generally, he has encouraged Biden to negotiate with House Republicans to reach a deal to raise the debt limit and avoid a default. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.), did not respond to requests for comment. But her primary opponent Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) said after voting to oppose the bill that the legislation threatens food assistance access for 17,000 people between the ages of 50 and 55 in Arizona.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment