Editor’s note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day’s biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro. Days after Silicon Valley Bank went bust, lawmakers are starting to roll out ideas on how to discourage similar weekend-wrecking calamities. Progressive firebrands led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) and her protégé Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) pitched a bill to roll back bipartisan changes to Dodd-Frank that was a major pain point for Democrats in 2018. Sen.Jon Tester (D-Mt.) – the architect of that Dodd-Frank overhaul — wants regulators to claw back bonuses that SVB’s leadership collected before their bank went into a tailspin. Some Republicans, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, are staking claims that SVB’s woes were a simple case of so-called woke bank management run amok. But it’s hard to craft public policy for an emergency brake to halt a fast-moving bank run on uninsured deposits. It’s even harder when access to immediate information and financial services are available on the same pocket-sized screen. And that created “a more acute pain point” for this particular bank run, House Financial Services Chair Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) told your MM host. “200 years ago? It was measured in days. 100 years ago? It was measured in hours. And now it's in minutes or seconds,” he said. SVB’s implosion was accelerated by society’s “continuous trajectory — for everything — of faster, better, cheaper.” For Silicon Valley Bank customers, “faster” and “better” almost sent them into a $150 billion-plus hole. McHenry said the Securities and Exchange Commission has “boatloads” of rules designed to prevent market manipulation. You can’t short bank stocks and then take to Twitter to gin up a run on deposits. But that doesn’t doesn’t preclude people from telegraphing genuine fears about a financial institution's health to friends, colleagues or strangers. A ton of ink has been spilled in the last week about how widely used social media networks and messaging applications hastened the panic that led depositors to pull $42 billion from SVB on March 9. In a viral Twitter thread, Tyler Stambaugh — a former risk management specialist at Accenture and JPMorgan Chase who now leads the online startup Magnetiq — argued that current rules offer no protection from banks’ exposure to “social media risk.” “These irrational types of events make it as easy as flipping open your phone and making a move,” Stambaugh said in an interview. “When you can do that en masse, that quickly, without human intervention? You can create these types of downward spirals that just don't stop.” Is there a solution for that? Stambaugh said that banks could beef up their social media presence to head off bad information and proactively engage with customers who might take flight. From a public policy perspective, however, there aren’t many options. “Free speech rights are free speech rights,” McHenry said. “In a moment of crisis like this, there are a lot of half-baked ideas,” he added. “The current one is about throttling social media around financial products — which I think is half-baked.” IT’S WEDNESDAY — Have you seen your family this week? Have tips, gossip or scoops? Let Sam know at ssutton@politico.com and Zach at zwarmbrodt@politico.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment