Saturday, November 19, 2022

Passive Investors Will Be Stuck in Limbo

Editor's note: Yesterday in Empire Financial Daily, we shared an essay from our colleague Marc Gerstein – the director of research at our corporate affiliate Chaikin Analytics. Today, Marc is back to explain why passive investors are in for a rude awakening... Trying to figure out the right value of the S&P 500 Index is […]
Not rendering correctly? View this e-mail as a web page here.

Editor's note: Yesterday in Empire Financial Daily, we shared an essay from our colleague Marc Gerstein – the director of research at our corporate affiliate Chaikin Analytics. Today, Marc is back to explain why passive investors are in for a rude awakening...


Passive Investors Will Be Stuck in Limbo

By Marc Gerstein


Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Walmart are betting billions on this

When the Internet came along, most people had never even heard of Google, Amazon, and Facebook. But by becoming early adopters and taking full advantage of the Internet, they became household names. Now, the same companies are among the early movers in a brand-new trend that's expected to deliver a knockout punch to a $3.4 trillion industry and potentially disrupt up to $100 trillion worth of global assets. Get the full details here.


Trying to figure out the right value of the S&P 500 Index is tough these days...

The benchmark index fell more than 25% from its January peak to its October low. So at first glance, you might think that means it's a good deal right now.

But by some measures, it's still significantly overpriced...

For example, S&P Global data shows that "operating" earnings per share ("EPS") for S&P 500 companies rose 750% from the end of 1988 through June 30 of this year. (Operating EPS is simply earnings that exclude unusual gains or losses.)

Over that same period, the S&P 500's price rose 1,263%.

If the index would have simply climbed in step with operating EPS, it would have been at about 2,360 in mid-October. That's roughly 34% below its low at that time.

Many Wall Street analysts are busy today debating the question, "Is the market priced fairly or not?" But folks, that misses the most important hurdle that investors face right now...

Put simply, investors are dealing with conditions they haven't seen for roughly 40 years. The era of passive gains is over. And investors who don't accept that will soon regret it.

Let me explain...


Recommended Link:

The ONLY way to play markets like these

Warren Buffett once said, "Price is what you pay... value is what you get." The best investor in the world knows the only way to prosper (especially in markets like these)... is to invest in VALUE. But this $2 stock could be the last value play in the market today. See why this $2 stock go up 25 times and still be a bargain here.


The critical piece of this puzzle is interest rates. And more specifically, it involves their relationship to what's known as the 'equity risk premium'...

Financial theory tells us that stock returns should exceed what we'd expect to get from so-called "risk free" securities – like U.S. Treasury bonds.

Think of this premium as a way to entice you to ignore the risk-free securities and invest in riskier stocks. The higher the premium, the more attractive stocks become.

You can see why equity risk premium is important. Financial "eggheads" swear by it. And with some simple back-of-the-envelope math, we can use this number to get a glimpse into the market's future...

To make it easy to follow, we'll just flip the S&P 500's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. That turns it into the earnings-to-price ratio – or "earnings yield." With this measure, we can directly compare stock returns with the return (or "yield") on risk-free assets like U.S. Treasury bonds.

We'll use earnings yield plus "dividend yield" to get the total "expected stock return." And for the expected return of risk-free securities, we'll use the 10-year U.S. Treasury note's yield as our benchmark.

Now, we want the equity risk premium to be as high as possible. (As you can see below, that's simply the expected stock return minus expected risk-free return.)

No firm rule exists for what we should consider a "good" equity risk premium. Generally, though, it's assumed that something between 5% and 5.5% is reasonable.

In the following table, you can see how things have changed over time...

The 3.1% risk premium at the end of 1988 was too low. That could have turned into a catastrophe for stocks if investors pulled out.

But over the next three-plus decades, interest rates – and by extension, the risk-free rate – plummeted spectacularly. The 10-year U.S. Treasury note's yield dropped from 9.1% at the end of 1988 all the way down to 1.5% at the end of 2021.

So instead of a catastrophe, that falling-rate market acted as a massive tailwind for the equity risk premium...

Stocks soared for essentially three-plus decades. Sure, there were some hiccups along the way – like the dot-com bust and the housing crash. But as I said earlier, the S&P 500 surged more than 1,200% from the end of 1988 through June this year.

Notice in the table above that the equity risk premium was darn high just after the housing crash in 2012. That was one of the best times to buy stocks in decades. And of course, it paid off for investors. The S&P 500's rise over the following decade was historic.

But now, the S&P 500 is back to a skimpy equity risk premium. As you can see in the table, it's now well under the "reasonable" 5% threshold.

That leaves us with two possible outcomes...

First, interest rates could go back to falling – like they did for decades leading up to earlier this year. Or earnings yields could fall (meaning P/E ratios could rise) – just like they did in 1988 and beyond.

The problem is... neither outcome is likely. Knowing that, we're in a tough spot today...

Even after the recent round of hikes, interest rates are still low compared with history. Inflation remains a big problem, so even higher rates are likely in the months ahead.

The earnings side poses a significant challenge, too. I wouldn't count on S&P 500 companies as a whole to deliver enough earnings growth to significantly raise earnings yields.

Put simply... most investors have never experienced a market environment like this one.

Rates dropped for more than 30 years. And stocks responded accordingly, going up and up.

But today, the equity risk premium is narrow. As a result, stocks are basically in limbo.

Investors hoping to overcome this harsh reality will need a different strategy. The passive-investing era of "just put money in the market and hope for big returns" is over.

Instead, it's time to get active.

Regards,

Marc Gerstein
November 19, 2022

Editor's note: When it comes to getting active, Chaikin Analytics founder Marc Chaikin just issued an urgent warning about a historic reset of the U.S. financial system... and that investors need to take a simple action before January 2, 2023, in order to prepare. In a brand-new presentation, he shares all the details – including how you could make a huge potential gain as the whole thing unfolds. Watch it here.


If someone forwarded you this e-mail and you would like to be added to the Empire Financial Daily e-mail list to receive e-mails like this every weekday, simply sign up here.

No comments:

Post a Comment

♟ How Markets Could React to Nvidia's Earnings

With post-election euphoria long gone, I'll be in buy the dip mode all week ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌...