Let the $275 trillion in money printing commence

Let the $275 trillion in Money Printing Commence   Howdy ,   Even a hard-headed evidence-based trader like myself listens when numbers like $275 trillion are thrown around.   That's the number McKinsey Global is throwing around.   Well connected think tanks like McKinsey set policy.   And while the puppeteers were distracting us with raids, billions of dollars in corporate welfare went out the back door and were given to tech companies (CHIPS act).   In other words, the central bankers that run the show are going to print print print print print.   They have their excuse to wage a never-ending war on plant food and move society towards their technocratic utopia.   I don't say these things to convince normies...they're hopeless.   I say these things so you can throw this info back in their face when they criticize you for being bullish on stocks over the next year or more.   Check out my evidence-filled rant about why we're in a new bull market here.   In the video, I mentioned that a strategy went into an inverse fund Thursday (which was correct).   It's already back into long S&P 500 fund!   This bull market isn't messing around...   ...and you won't believe how freakin' SHORT the dumb money is. Wow!   Check out the evidence:   Watch here >>   (Video gets pulled in 72 hours because this is up-to-the-minute info) Trade smart,   Dan "Prince of Proof" Murphy                   Portfolio Boss, Inc. 260 Newport Center Dr, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660   Don't want to stay in the loop with Dan? We'll be sad to see you go, but you can unsubscribe to no longer receive emails.   Government required disclaimer: The results listed herein are based on hypothetical trades. Plainly speaking, these trades were not actually executed. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under (or over) compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors such as lack of liquidity. You may have done better or worse than the results portrayed.