But on Wednesday some soft earnings from big retailers like Target resparked those recession fears and sent the Dow down 1,164 points, or 3.6 percent, the worst percentage decline for the index since June of 2020. WalMart reported disappointing numbers on Tuesday adding to a sense of gloom from giant retailers. The S&P dropped 4 percent Wednesday and the tech-dominated Nasdaq cratered close to another 5 percent. The Nasdaq index is now firmly in bear market territory, down 28 percent on the year. The S&P 500, the index most important to average investors (and voters) , is now down 18 percent on the year and close to a bear market (a drop of 20 percent or more from a recent high). Stock market levels don't directly decide elections. But they do affect how people feel about their own wealth and thus how much they spend. A slight reduction in that spending driven by lower stock prices would be welcome by the Fed because it would ease its job of cooling the economy to better align demand with supply. But Powell and his colleagues (and the White House) don't want the kind of wild swings that have helped crush consumer confidence even as spending is holding up remarkably well in the face of over 8 percent annualized inflation. So what will stop it? — That's the real question. Wall Streeters tell MM that while retail earnings sparked Wednesday's decline, technical issues were also at play, including the search for a bottom on the S&P. Investors are desperately trying to figure out the economy's direction and whether Powell can really only hike the Fed's key borrowing rate by a half point next month or will be forced into bigger increases. "No doubt the WalMart and Target earnings highlighting the negative impact of inflation on margins has intensified recession fears," Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist at the Leuthold Group, emailed MM. "However, more than anything, it is technicals driving this stock market right now. … If it wasn't [earnings] news, it would probably have been other news (like a Fed comment) that would've set off another test of the 20 percent down level." Paulsen also noted that not every day is a down day : "To highlight 'meaningless volatility,' the S&P is off by almost 4 percent today … but in the last 5 trading days it is off by only 13 basis points. It has gone nowhere 'VERY FAST' in both directions as it searches for a bottom." Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Cresset Capital, also mentioned the poor retail earnings. But he also saw an upside for the Fed. "Stocks are off on slowing demand and margin pressure, as evidenced by Walmart and Target results," Ablin emailed MM. "I think investors were dismayed that these seemingly safe stocks aren't immune." But he added that some eventual decline in spending, suggested by the retailer reports, will be "doing the Fed's work for them." Jitters over Powell — Other Wall Street analysts put much of the blame for recent declines on a lack of confidence that Powell can pull off a "soft-landing" and will instead crash the economy into recession. "Investors see the Fed as moving too slowly on the inflation fight: a 75 [basis point] hike might have been feared, but it appears it would have been preferred," Bank of America analysts wrote in note on Wednesday. Powell himself said Tuesday at a Wall Street Journal event that the Fed needs to see inflation "coming down in a clear and convincing way and we're going to keep pushing until we see that. If we don't see that, we will have to consider moving more aggressively." That's left investors guessing and hanging on every big earnings report and data release. And when that happens, markets tend to go on a wild ride. IT'S THURSDAY — Some corners of Twitter had a temporary freakout Wednesday over the prospect of a price increase that hit close to home: the $1.50 Costco hot dog. Not to worry, the rumors appeared to be triggered by a fake Twitter headline. But MarketWatch's Steve Goldstein asks the all-important question: How much would you pay for a Costco hot dog? Let us know, and send your best tips, ideas and feedback, too! kdavidson@politico.com, @katedavidson or aweaver@politico.com, @aubreeeweaver.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment