U.S. Steel’s decision to sell itself to Japan’s Nippon Steel may make a lot of business sense. But to a Washington hell-bent on protecting America’s industrial soul, it’s the ultimate betrayal. The $14 billion deal for one of America’s most storied companies is triggering a bipartisan barrage of criticism, and it presents a major headache for President Joe Biden as he enters a race against a likely opponent who will no doubt use the issue to score political points. “A foreign company should not be able to swoop in, ignore the voices of union workers, and buy a major American steel manufacturer behind closed doors,” Senate Banking Chair Sherrod Brown said. A bipartisan group of lawmakers — among them Sens. J.D. Vance, Josh Hawley, Bob Casey and John Fetterman — are urging Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen to block the purchase of the Pittsburgh-based company on national security grounds. On the campaign trail, candidates are using the news as fodder in key Rust Belt races. The acquisition is revealing the limit of corporate America’s appreciation for U.S. industrial policy. It’s an exhibit of how efforts to protect what many view to be a critical industry with tariffs and other measures can be incongruous with a free market system. For a company at the center of those efforts, only one thing mattered in the end: maximizing shareholder value. Rewind to 2018. U.S. Steel CEO David Burritt was at former President Donald Trump’s side, cheering his decision to put tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum. The Trump administration justified the move by making the case that low-cost, heavily subsidized steel from countries like China undermined American companies like U.S. Steel. The Commerce Department found that imports were a threat to the U.S. industry’s ability to supply the military and critical infrastructure needs. “President Trump does have it absolutely right,” Burritt said on Fox Business at the time. The iconic company was the steely thread that ran through a new consensus that economic security was tantamount to national security. U.S. Steel’s decades-long cries against allegedly unfair competition helped Trump build his case for tariffs. Robert Lighthizer, Trump’s trade chief, spent a career defending U.S. Steel’s interests in trade cases. He represented the firm against the very company that now wants to buy it. Fast forward to Monday. Burritt said the deal will create “a truly global steel company” — something anathema to recent policies to keep critical industries and supply chains under American control. U.S. Steel sought a buyer for months, as it languished despite government efforts to protect it. The expanded Nippon Steel is expected to still produce less than the largest Chinese steel producer. “If you think steel is about security, and if you think domestic steel production is important, then you should be championing this deal,” said Christine McDaniel, a senior research fellow at George Mason University’s market-oriented Mercatus Center. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre declined to comment on the deal Tuesday given that it could be subject to regulatory review but said the president supports union jobs and competition. If the transaction triggers a national security review, it could end up on Biden’s desk. A decision of that magnitude would be a major 2024 test of the president’s economic approach. It’s Wednesday — Send tips to zwarmbrodt@politico.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment