If nothing else, this summer’s record-smashing heat has demonstrated that air conditioning can be a life-saving necessity. Yet more than 30 million low-income households that are eligible for federal funding to help pay their cooling costs haven’t received a dime, writes Thomas Frank in an investigation published today. That’s largely because the federal program to protect poor families from dangerous temperatures was designed with frigid winters in mind. And almost every state spends the bulk of that program’s money on heating, even as summer death tolls rise. As the planet continues to warm from burning fossil fuels — and heat kills more people in the U.S. than any other weather-related disaster — government officials are facing pressure to provide more financial assistance for air conditioning. “The programs haven’t caught up with the change in climate,” Mark Wolfe, executive director of the National Energy Assistance Directors Association, told Tom. Congress created the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program in the late 1970s to help families pay for soaring heating costs. Lawmakers incorporated cooling costs into the program in the 1980s. But the formula the government uses to divvy up the program’s roughly $4 billion a year to states favors those with high heating costs. As a result, 16 states, including some with significant heat risk, received zero funding to pay cooling costs from 2001 through 2021, Tom found. And hot, populous states often get less money than cooler ones with fewer people. A number of Southern GOP lawmakers whose districts baked this summer declined to seek changes to LIHEAP because they do not want to be associated with a welfare program, according to an official close to the program who asked not to be named to avoid antagonizing lawmakers. (As Tom notes, former President Donald Trump proposed eliminating LIHEAP each year he was in office.) While heat is killing more people every year, winters remain deadly. States typically receive their LIHEAP allocation in the fall and spend more than 70 percent between October and March. Saving more of that money for summer AC costs could disadvantage people who need help paying for heat. “It’s a resource issue,” said Katrina Metzler, executive director of the National Energy and Utility Affordability Coalition. “As the climate changes, the need is growing faster than the funds are growing.”
|
No comments:
Post a Comment