SPOTLIGHT ON STAR GARDEN: Dancers at a North Hollywood topless bar voted to be represented by Actors’ Equity Association last week, setting them up to be the only unionized strippers in the U.S., according to the union. But beyond the headlines, the Star Garden case might have also revealed something about the NLRB: the agency’s thinking on factors for worker classification. In a request for review of the election, the company argued in part that the dancers were not employees, but rather independent performers leasing space in the club. The review was denied by the board. That could open the door to other workers in similar arrangements, like hair stylists or workout class instructors. “Just because somebody's leasing a chair in a salon or other types of situations like that … Still, nonetheless, they say, ‘No, these people are employees,’” Michael J. Lotito, who represents employers at the law firm Littler, said of the NLRB. The case is “one tiny indication” that board members will look past employment designs “that are structured, in part, to create an independent contractor presumption,” he said. Employers are closely watching classification issues, as the Labor Department is slated to release a rule on independent contractor classification this month. Additionally, the NLRB is also set to release a decision related to the issue in its The Atlanta Opera Inc. case, he said. Kate Shindle, president of Actors’ Equity Association, said she hopes workers in similarly nontraditional employment arrangements will be able to organize. Star Gardens workers voted unanimously last week to unionize, following a regional director’s approval of a settlement agreement days earlier that resolved multiple unfair labor practice allegations. “The way that public sentiment has coalesced around the idea that strippers especially need a union … really, really fills me with optimism,” Shindle said. “When we first met with the dancers, they were very open about and very aware of the stigma of their industry.” The Star Gardens case, as well as the potentially blockbuster college athletics case, shows the NLRB’s willingness to get creative. Lotito pointed to the inclusion of a provision in the settlement agreement barring the bar’s operator from refiling for bankruptcy for a year. “The general counsel and obviously regional offices have been very aggressive and very creative with different remedies. I thought that was a good example,” he said. GOOD MORNING. It’s Monday, May 22. Welcome back to Morning Shift, your go-to tipsheet on labor and employment-related immigration. Send feedback, tips, and exclusives to NNiedzwiadek@politico.com and OOlander@politico.com. Follow us on Twitter at @nickniedz and @oliviaolanderr.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment