NEW YORK — Wall Street’s top GOP donors are slowly realizing that former President Donald Trump is all-but-certain to clinch the nomination. While billionaires and their strategists continue to throw Hail Marys, they’re also thinking about when to throw in the towel. “The Street still hopes for somebody else,” Thomas Peterffy, the GOP mega donor and founder of Interactive Brokers, told POLITICO from the sidelines of the Goldman Sachs U.S. Financial Services Conference last week. The odds are exceedingly narrow, even with former Ambassador Nikki Haley’s recent surge in the polls. If Haley, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis or another Republican fails to overtake Trump, Peterffy said he still hopes for a brokered GOP convention — which hasn’t happened since Thomas Dewey was on the ballot in 1948 — or a viable, as-yet unannounced No Labels candidate. The risks of a second Trump presidency are “incalculable and unpredictable,” he said. Of course, Peterffy has previously gone on record as saying that he would likely vote for Trump in 2024 if the former president clinches the nomination. Peterffy’s comments reflect the collective angst of Wall Street Republicans whose views on Trump are completely divorced from those of the GOP base, according to conversations with more than a dozen bankers, attorneys, political consultants and asset managers. There was a period when it seemed as though Trump might fade, allowing a younger, calmer alternative to take his place. Instead, the opposite happened. A series of criminal indictments have had no effect on Trump’s popularity. Some believe it crystallized his support. Now, unless Haley or DeSantis pull off the impossible — or if there’s a deus ex machina event that upends the political world — high-dollar GOP donors will soon face an uncomfortable decision as to how to proceed. “My sense is Wall Street will be somewhat split on a Trump-Biden rematch,” former Republican Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee told MM. “The border issue, foreign policy, regulation, trade, stability and mental clarity will weigh on people in varying ways.” For some, the thought of a second Trump term will be enough to keep them off the field. Wall Street likes predictability. And while some of the finance industry’s kingmakers might blanch at the thought of four more years of President Joe Biden, the potential dysfunction of a second Trump term could raise existential questions about the future of American democracy. Setting aside Trump’s recent noodling on what he could accomplish in a one-day dictatorship, markets are increasingly wary of how U.S. political disruptions can ripple across the global financial system. Contested elections and January 6-style spasms of political violence now affect the market for U.S. Treasury securities. The uncertainty over Trump’s broader agenda, or who he might tap to execute that agenda, has muted any enthusiasm for some of his pro-business leanings. Still, many in the financial services world expect GOP donors to fall in line behind Trump, even if they were repelled by his denial of the 2020 election results and alleged criminal activity. If they choose to engage with the former president, Trump allies say the door is open. “Trump is so much better than any of these candidates for Wall Street, when it comes to ballooning the economy and allowing for the free flow of business and competition,” said Constellations Group CEO Bill White, a Trump fundraiser who previously led the Intrepid Museum in New York City. White added that the former president will welcome big ticket donors back into the fold “with open arms,” even if they’ve already made contributions to his challengers. To the extent there are any concerns about a Trump dictatorship, no one in his circle has raised any alarms. “People want President Trump to be strong. They know, a weak president — like the one we have now — is very dangerous for our global stability, our global economy,” White said. IT’S MONDAY — Welcome to the working week. And as always, send tips and suggestions to Sam at ssutton@politico.com and Zach at zwarmbrodt@politico.com
| 
No comments:
Post a Comment