'THIS IS NOT THE TIME': There are many more earthly concerns about expanding the commercial space launch market. A missive this week from Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia to the FAA raised concerns about "shortcomings in the environmental review process" for the proposed Spaceport Camden along the Atlantic coast. "Spaceport Camden would be the closest launch facility to populated areas ever approved by the FAA," Warnock wrote. But he noted that "the new, small rocket application states that 20 percent of rockets launched from Spaceport Camden are expected to fail. This is a dramatic increase over the 2.5-6 percent failure rate disclosed to the public" in a draft environmental impact statement. He also raised the potential for serious environmental damage. "Further, the FAA has stated in the past that a rocket failure could trigger uncontrollable wildfires on Cumberland and Little Cumberland Islands," the freshman senator wrote. "Yet the FAA did not address the risk of wildfire to the National Seashore, park visitors, wildlife, or private property." "This is not the time to cut corners on environmental review or cut out public participation in the evaluation of this project," he added. "The incoming FAA leadership should be given the opportunity to evaluate fully these issues with the benefit of public input before moving forward with a final decision." A final environmental impact statement is slated to be completed this month. BIGGER BUT BETTER? The Government Accountability Office on Thursday issued its latest assessment of NASA's major development programs. And you guessed it. "This marks the fifth year in a row that cumulative cost and schedule performance deteriorated," the independent congressional watchdog found. "Since our last report, NASA's portfolio of major projects in development increased its estimated costs by $1.1 billion and delayed its collective schedule by more than 3 years. These year-to-year cost overruns and delays — most of which were not a result of Covid-19 — were driven by seven projects." Some of the main culprits: You won't be surprised to learn that the Boeing Space Launch System and Lockheed Martin Orion spacecraft were big drivers. Another major driver was the Exploration Ground System program, which aims to modernize the infrastructure at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida in part to launch the SLS and Orion. "About 90 percent of the portfolio's annual cost growth and nearly half of its schedule delays experienced in the past year were from two programs — SLS and EGS," GAO found. Overall, the cumulative cost growth for the agency's top 20 programs has been $9.6 billion — $7.1 billion of which stems from the James Webb Space Telescope and SLS. Moreover, "these two projects account for about half of the cumulative schedule delays," GAO maintains. And the portfolio of major programs is about to get bigger. "The number of projects in development is expected to grow further as the agency plans for eight of the 13 major projects currently in formulation — including six Artemis projects — to set baselines in 2021," GAO states. |
No comments:
Post a Comment