Election-year politics are making the Federal Reserve’s job harder as Chair Jerome Powell tries to nail the timing of interest rate cuts. But after America votes, the central bank may have even bigger problems. The reelection of former President Donald Trump could upend the path of monetary policy if new tariffs and immigration restrictions stoke inflation and build pressure to keep interest rates higher for longer, according to economists and analysts. Even if President Joe Biden is reelected, next year is still fraught with potential fiscal policy challenges, with the expiration of Trump-era tax cuts and another fight over the debt limit. What happens to the tax cuts — whether they’re extended, scrapped, pared back or expanded — could have significant impacts on the outlook for economic growth. It all threatens to reset expectations around the Fed as soon as the dust settles after election day. “I don’t think the FOMC is all that concerned about the optics of cutting rates in May or June in an election year,” Wells Fargo senior economist Mike Pugliese said. “But what I do think matters quite a lot is the outcome of the election itself.” Wells Fargo released a new analysis this week that backs up the idea that election considerations don’t play a major role in Fed monetary policy decisions. The bank’s economists found that the Fed has adjusted its policy rate nearly the same number of times in presidential years as non-election years. But post-election fallout can have an immediate impact on the Fed’s deliberations. After the 2016 election, when a red wave set up expectations for tax cuts, the transcript of the December FOMC meeting showed the word “fiscal” was mentioned 212 times, up from 17 in November, according to Wells Fargo. “It was not just markets that began to recalibrate the outlook to include more expansionary fiscal policy,” Pugliese wrote in a report with Wells Fargo’s Sarah House and Aubrey George. “The Federal Reserve's staff economists incorporated fiscal policy accommodation into its baseline outlook, and about half of FOMC participants assumed more fiscal stimulus in their submitted forecasts for the Summary of Economic Projections.” What does the 2024 scenario look like? The biggest swing for the Fed would likely be the return of Trump. Even before he’d get a chance to reshape the central bank with new leadership, the Fed would have to brace for the economic effects of sweeping tariffs and more restrictive immigration policy, as well as potential tax reforms. “What they’re left holding the bag with is a systematic disruption of the global economy that could risk capital flows into the United States,” said RSM US principal and chief economist Joseph Brusuelas. “And then the Fed has to make policy around further disruption of the status quo.” It’s a scenario that some analysts believe could fan inflation and swing the pendulum to a tighter stance of monetary policy over time. “It would be ironic for a lot of people to think of it in that context,” said State Street senior macro strategist Noel Dixon. “But it could be more inflationary for a Republican Trump administration versus a Biden administration because of the uniqueness of his policies.” Trump campaign national press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement that Trump’s border and deportation plan is “America’s only hope for economic survival." She added that “his return to maximizing domestic oil and gas production will create an economic boom and bring inflation to zero.” For now, Powell and his Fed colleagues are in the driver’s seat. Dixon doesn’t expect markets will start to pay attention until around the presidential nominating conventions. “For the moment, these are problems for another day for the Fed,” Pugliese said. “But once we get to another day in the third and fourth quarter, it’s going to be something that starts to factor into their calculus.” It’s Thursday — Which of Biden and Trump’s second-term policies should we look at next? Send tips to zwarmbrodt@politico.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment