Dear Reader,
During his 16 years on CNBC's "Fast Money," Jon Najarian made some incredible calls…
For instance, he personally invested in Facebook on IPO day…
Before the stock climbed as high as 1,900%...
He called Palantir a long-term buy on live TV back in 2020…
Before it soared as high as 2,000%...
And in early 2014, he put his neck out on the line on national TV recommending Tesla…
Due to its groundbreaking "over the air" update technology and upcoming launch of the Model X, he told viewers that Tesla is NOT just a car company…
Turns out, he was exactly right… And since then, Tesla stock has seen peak gains of 3,392%!
But this "33X" call on Tesla might pale in comparison to Jon's newest prediction about Elon Musk…
Because it has to do wfith Musk's historic SpaceX IPO…
And a potential $44 TRILLION plan for what could be coming next.
By making the simple moves Hall of Fame Trader, Jon Najarian will tell you about here…
You could set yourself up for incredible wealth.
Click here to see what Jon Najarian is predicting now.
Gold Is Testing Its 200-Day SMA—These 3 Mining Stocks Are the Play
By Chris Markoch. Published: 6/15/2026.
Key Points
- Gold's test of its 200-day SMA may represent a healthy consolidation rather than the end of the bull market.
- Agnico Eagle and Royal Gold offer defensive exposure through cost discipline and royalty-based cash flows.
- Kinross Gold provides greater upside potential for investors expecting gold prices to resume their advance.
- Special Report: SpaceX is offering you shares. Don't take them.
Gold is at an inflection point. After a historic run that took the metal above $5,300 per ounce in January 2025, spot prices have fallen below the 200-day simple moving average and briefly slipped below $4,100.
J.P. Morgan's head of base and precious metals research recently described gold’s move as a "sideways plod," with investor attention fading amid concerns that the Fed might have to respond to energy-driven inflation with rate hikes.
Better than SpaceX? Grab this ticker instead. (Ad)
Larry Benedict generated $274 million for his clients by finding the trades most investors missed. Now he says 'The Final Phase of Elon's Master Plan' is about to trigger one of the biggest wealth transfers in market history.
He's identified one ticker positioned to capture it - and it isn't SpaceX or Tesla. He's releasing the name for free, but the window is closing.
Get the full details and the ticker name before access closesGold is also under pressure because at least two central banks, Turkey and India, have sold portions of their physical gold to prop up their currencies, which are being ravaged by inflation.
Why Gold's Pullback Could Create Opportunity
Gold's pullback, as frustrating as it may be for speculators, is historically constructive for the long-term case. When gold tests its 200-day simple moving average, one of two things usually happens: the price bounces and momentum resets, setting the stage for the next leg higher, or it briefly breaks down and flushes out weak hands before recovering.
However, volatility like this often keeps investors away from physical gold. The good news is that both outcomes tend to reward gold miners, especially those with the lowest all-in sustaining costs, cleanest balance sheets, and enough operational leverage to benefit when margins expand again. Here are three names built for both scenarios.
Agnico Eagle Mines: The Cost Discipline Standard-Bearer
When it comes to senior gold producers, cost discipline is the ultimate differentiator—and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE: AEM) is a benchmark in that regard. The company posted full-year 2025 AISC (all-in sustaining cost) of $1,339 per ounce, revised to $1,313 under its updated cost composition methodology, against an average realized gold price of $3,453 per ounce.
That spread gives Agnico margins most producers would envy. The advantage showed up in record annual free cash flow of $4.4 billion.
The 2026 guidance range of $1,400 to $1,550 per ounce in AISC looks conservative relative to where gold is trading today. Even as gold pulls back toward the $4,000 level, Agnico's cost structure keeps it comfortably profitable, while higher-cost peers feel the squeeze.
Geography is part of the story, too. Most of Agnico's production comes from Canada—Nunavut, Ontario, and Quebec—with additional assets in Finland and Mexico. That portfolio carries a geopolitical stability premium that investors have increasingly been willing to pay. In a world where supply-chain risk and resource nationalism are live concerns for miners operating in West Africa or Latin America, Agnico's Canadian foundation is a genuine differentiator, not just marketing language.
The company trades at around 15x earnings and 12x forward earnings. Both numbers are discounts to the S&P 500 and, more importantly, to the company’s historic average. Analysts are bullish, with a consensus Moderate Buy rating and a $236.08 price target, representing 45% upside as of this writing.
Royal Gold: Gold Exposure Without the Shovel
Royal Gold (NASDAQ: RGLD) isn’t a miner. But the company’s streaming and royalty model has structural advantages that are independent of gold’s spot price. Where a traditional miner faces rising labor costs, fuel expenses, and operational risks, Royal Gold simply receives a contractual percentage of production or purchases metal at a fixed price. The company's AISC is effectively zero in the conventional sense; its "cost" is the upfront capital deployed to acquire streams and royalties.
The 2025 results demonstrated what that model looks like in a high-gold-price environment. Revenue surpassed $1 billion for the first time, a 43% jump from 2024, while record operating cash flow came in at $704.8 million. The company's adjusted EBITDA margin runs above 80%. Q1 2026 was even stronger—revenue hit $469 million for a single quarter, up 143% year over year, as the full contribution from its acquisitions of Sandstorm Gold and Horizon Copper came through for the first time.
The royalty model also means Royal Gold holds up better in a gold downdraft. Fixed-cost streaming agreements insulate it from mine-level cost inflation, and its diversified portfolio spread across four continents limits single-asset exposure. Gold still drove 71% of revenue in Q1 2026, giving investors meaningful leverage to the metal's price.
For investors who believe that gold will continue to trade below its 200-day SMA before reversing, Royal Gold offers the best risk-adjusted way to stay long the gold thesis without holding the most operationally vulnerable names. Analysts give RGLD a consensus price target of $280.70, which would be an increase of about 41.8%.
Kinross Gold (KGC): Higher Beta for the Bulls
Kinross Gold (NYSE: KGC) is the name for investors who believe in a bullish reversal in gold prices. In 2025, Kinross produced 2.15 million attributable gold equivalent ounces at AISC of $1,372 per ounce while generating full-year revenue of $4.85 billion. Q4 attributable free cash flow hit a record $769.4 million, and management used the strength to reduce debt, including redeeming $500 million in 2027 notes and raising its dividend by 17%.
The balance sheet transformation is notable. A few years ago, Kinross carried meaningful balance sheet risk and elevated costs relative to senior peers.
That’s no longer the case. As of Q1 2026, the company held $780 million in cash with $450 million in additional liquidity. Record AISC margins of more than $3,000 per ounce in Q1 2026, against realized prices north of $4,800, show what the business looks like when gold glitters.
About 70% of the company’s production comes from the Americas, which reduces geopolitical risk relative to peers with heavier exposure to West Africa.
The Great Bear project in Ontario provides a credible, long-dated growth option as the company advances it toward a production decision.
KGC has a forward P/E of around 8x and has a consensus price target of $38.81, which would be a 61% increase from the stock’s closing price on June 10.
Microsoft’s Xbox Problem Is Bigger Than a Console War
By Jeffrey Neal Johnson. Published: 6/17/2026.
Key Points
- Microsoft’s Xbox business is under pressure as weak hardware revenue and thin margins raise questions about the current gaming strategy.
- A more software-focused Xbox model could help Microsoft reduce its exposure to low-margin console hardware.
- Investors are watching whether restructuring can improve gaming profitability while Microsoft prioritizes cloud and artificial intelligence spending.
- Special Report: SpaceX is offering you shares. Don't take them.
Strategic pivots rarely happen without a major catalyst forcing the issue. For Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), that catalyst may be buried deep in the razor-thin margins of its interactive entertainment division. A recent internal memo from Xbox Chief Executive Officer Asha Sharma revealed that Microsoft expects the gaming unit to end fiscal year 2026 with an accountability margin of roughly 3%.
When you place that figure next to Microsoft's approximately 39% corporate net margin, the structural drag becomes difficult to ignore. Retail investors often focus on revenue, but institutional capital cares about free cash flow and margin expansion.
Better than SpaceX? Grab this ticker instead. (Ad)
Larry Benedict generated $274 million for his clients by finding the trades most investors missed. Now he says 'The Final Phase of Elon's Master Plan' is about to trigger one of the biggest wealth transfers in market history.
He's identified one ticker positioned to capture it - and it isn't SpaceX or Tesla. He's releasing the name for free, but the window is closing.
Get the full details and the ticker name before access closesDragging a highly profitable corporate structure down with a capital-intensive division creates an artificial valuation ceiling. Microsoft built a trillion-dollar empire on high-margin software and cloud architecture. Subsidizing loss-leader gaming consoles actively dilutes the immense profitability of the company's core enterprise services.
The Real Cost of the Hardware War
The physical hardware business remains notoriously cyclical and highly capital-intensive. Producing the boxes required to play modern video games demands massive upfront investment. Manufacturing costs have surged globally, with NAND memory and other critical component prices rising by as much as 700% since the current generation of consoles originally launched.
These escalating production costs directly contributed to a severe 33% year-over-year plunge in Xbox hardware revenue during Microsoft's third quarter of fiscal year 2026. Selling hardware at a loss only makes financial sense if you can guarantee a massive, captive audience to buy high-margin software over a 10-year cycle. When hardware costs outpace the software attach rate, the entire ecosystem begins to fracture.
Player 2: Losing the Install Base Battle
Understanding the need for a structural overhaul requires examining the current state of the global gaming market. The install base deficit between Microsoft and Sony (NYSE: SONY) has widened to an unsustainable degree.
Sony's PlayStation 5 currently commands an estimated 75 million active units globally. That dominant market share dwarfs the 30 million units sold across the Xbox Series X and Series S ecosystem. This hardware gap directly caps the growth potential of Xbox Game Pass, Microsoft's flagship recurring revenue subscription service. Microsoft attempted to bridge the resulting revenue shortfall with an aggressive pricing strategy in October 2025, raising the Game Pass Ultimate tier to $30 per month from its longstanding $19.99 per month price.
Consumers immediately showed heavy subscription elasticity, resulting in millions of cancellations. Subscription elasticity is a critical metric for software-as-a-service models. When a provider raises prices, it tests the absolute pricing power of its ecosystem. Losing millions of users over a simple rate increase suggests that Xbox Game Pass lacks the inelastic demand seen in Microsoft's enterprise software subscriptions.
A subsequent price correction to $23 per month in April 2026 stemmed the bleeding, but Microsoft failed to restore the subscription service to its previous growth trajectory. You simply cannot maximize the return on a $69 billion investment, which is the exact price Microsoft paid for Activision Blizzard, by restricting popular software to a distant second-place hardware ecosystem.
Maintaining a closed hardware pipeline also prevents Microsoft from licensing lucrative intellectual property to competitors. Third-party platforms often extract higher margins from Xbox titles than Microsoft realizes directly through physical console sales.
Respawning Xbox as a Subsidiary
Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella recently signaled a willingness to fundamentally change how Xbox operates. Strategic leaks indicate that executive leadership may be seriously evaluating a transition of Xbox into a wholly owned, independent subsidiary.
This strategy directly mirrors the successful corporate structures of LinkedIn and GitHub. Operating as an independent subsidiary allows a division to maintain a distinct internal culture and greater operational agility, while also insulating Microsoft's broader earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) from division-specific volatility.
By operating independently, Xbox could aggressively pivot toward platform-agnostic cloud gaming. Shedding the financial obligation to win a hardware war would allow the gaming brand to focus entirely on software distribution and recurring subscription revenue across all interactive devices, including smart televisions, mobile phones, and rival consoles.
Preparation for a leaner future is already underway internally. Microsoft is executing severe cost-reduction measures to eliminate bloated administrative overhead. Development studios, including Compulsion Games, Ninja Theory, and Double Fine, are facing permanent closure or active spin-outs. Trimming these prestige, high-cost, low-return operations provides immediate overhead relief ahead of scheduled Microsoft corporate layoffs in July.
Leveling Up Shareholder Value
Microsoft’s market sentiment has been turbulent recently, with shares slipping below $400 and the stock’s earnings multiple compressing into the low 20s. Even after that reset, Microsoft still trades like a company expected to deliver consistent, scalable growth. Funneling capital into low-margin gaming hardware threatens that narrative, particularly as investors scrutinize the rising cost of global artificial intelligence infrastructure.
High-profile money managers, including Bill Ackman at Pershing Square, have recently rotated capital out of certain megacap tech holdings, demanding absolute operational efficiency from the leaders of the artificial intelligence race. Microsoft is also facing shareholder lawsuits and increased scrutiny over the capital expenditure demands of the Azure cloud business. In this macroeconomic environment, maintaining a 3% margin is a luxury Microsoft can no longer afford.
Divesting the low-margin hardware infrastructure would fundamentally restructure Microsoft's interactive entertainment sector. Removing billions in gaming hardware subsidies from Microsoft's balance sheet would immediately improve return on equity and free up vital capital. Microsoft could then redirect that capital into high-yield cloud computing infrastructure and its active $60 billion share repurchase program.
The Final Boss: Executing the Spin-Off
A structural shift away from physical hardware distribution presents a compelling long-term thesis for Microsoft. Isolating the gaming division protects corporate earnings, streamlines internal operations, and positions Microsoft to dominate the software side of the entertainment sector without the heavy anchor of physical manufacturing.
Investors may want to monitor upcoming July restructuring announcements and carefully assess how a formalized subsidiary structure could improve forward earnings guidance before adding Microsoft shares to active portfolios.
This email communication is a paid advertisement provided by Banyan Hill Publishing, a third-party advertiser of InsiderTrades.com and MarketBeat.
This ad is sent on behalf of Banyan Hill Publishing. P.O. Box 8378, Delray Beach, FL 33482.
If you would like to unsubscribe from receiving offers for Market Rebellion, please click here.
If you need assistance with your newsletter, please don't hesitate to email our U.S. based support team at contact@marketbeat.com.
If you no longer wish to receive email from InsiderTrades.com, you can unsubscribe.
© 2006-2026 MarketBeat Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
345 N Reid Place #620, Sioux Falls, SD 57103. USA..
Post a Comment
0Comments