Establishment Republicans on Wall Street hoped Donald Trump would use his running mate selection to extend them an olive branch. Instead, he elevated one of their chief antagonists. The choice of Sen. J.D. Vance is the latest sign that a second Trump term could move the GOP further away from its traditional pro-business ethos in favor of a populist approach that’s more skeptical of corporate power. Vance, a first-term Republican from Ohio, has emerged in his brief time in office as the Senate GOP’s top Wall Street critic, using his perch on the Banking Committee to chastise industry leaders and push legislation that would rein in the sector. “Unfettered free-market capitalism is not something that sits well with Sen. Vance,” Travis Norton, a former Republican staffer now with the lobbying firm Brownstein, told our Eleanor Mueller. The pick is likely to disappoint some old-guard party power brokers and donors on Wall Street who have long been skeptical of Trump. As our Alex Isenstadt reports in a must-read piece detailing how Vance got the nod, mainstream donors close to the other reported finalists in the veepstakes — North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and Sens. Marco Rubio and Tim Scott — were eager to undercut Vance. Citadel CEO Ken Griffin and former News Corp. chief Rupert Murdoch were among those who made it known to the Trump camp they were against the Ohio senator. But thanks in part to Vance's ties to other fundraising bases — namely in Silicon Valley — he was able to overcome the establishment opposition. A Yale Law School alum and Marine Corps veteran, Vance first rose to fame as a Trump critic in 2016 after the publication of his best-selling memoir, “Hillbilly Elegy.” But since embracing Trump during his successful 2022 Senate run, Vance has worked to cultivate an image as a new-age populist conservative who’s willing to take on big business. He has pushed an array of legislation targeting the financial services industry, including a proposal with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank that would penalize executives of failed banks. He has also praised President Joe Biden's FTC Chair, Lina Khan, who has led an aggressive antitrust crackdown. Vance in recent weeks has also begun to insert himself in Capitol Hill’s debate over cryptocurrency regulation. He has been workshopping an industry-friendly crypto bill — and digital asset enthusiasts are cheering on his selection. “Trump’s pick of Senator Vance as his next VP is a tremendous boost for U.S. innovation and the digital asset industry,” Cody Carbone, chief policy officer at the Digital Chamber, told Eleanor. “The choice highlights the campaign’s unwavering support for digital assets.” To be sure, crypto is one of many key financial regulation issues on which Vance aligns with the mainstream of his party. He has joined other Republicans in fighting regulations that the financial services industry opposes, including a plan to increase capital requirements on large banks. But he has suggested that the GOP’s support for lighter-touch regulation shouldn’t come for free. “If you guys are going to use the financial power that you’ve accumulated to go to war against the values of our voters, impoverish our constituents who rely on cheap energy and destroy the jobs of people who work in the energy sector, why should [Republicans] listen to you when you come and ask us for a tax break or for reasonable regulations?” he said to bank CEOs testifying before the Senate last year. “I’m one Republican who wants to have a good relationship with you, but the more you guys [insert] yourself into these fights, the less good that relationship that will be.” IT’S TUESDAY — What do you think about the possibility of VP Vance? Let me know at jgoodman@politico.com and @Jasper_Goodman. As always, send tips and suggestions to ssutton@politico.com and @samjsutton. If you’re in Milwaukee, say hey to Victoria Guida (vguida@politico.com) and Zach Warmbrodt (zwarmbrodt@politico.com). And if you can’t make it, be sure to catch their POLITICO Grill panels online.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment