FACING THE HEAT: The Biden administration’s proposal to overhaul safety standards for firefighters and fellow emergency responders nationwide has divided a major labor union from their volunteer peers and others in the field. The International Association of Fire Fighters has come out strongly in favor of the proposed standards the Occupational Safety and Health Administration first announced back in December, would be the first substantial update to what’s known as the Fire Brigades Standard since its creation during the Carter administration. It would call for baseline medical screening, training and certification requirements, access to certain types of protective gear, among other provisions. (The standard would also be rebranded as the Emergency Response Standard moving forward.) The existing standard is wildly outdated and does not apply to many fire departments, leaving a patchwork of protections established by state and local governments and the National Fire Protection Association that can leave people exposed, according to IAFF leader Edward Kelly. “We want healthy firefighters,” Kelly said in an interview. “If we have healthy firefighters, we have a healthier fire department. And the safer and healthier the fire department, the safer and healthier the community.” However, of the more than 2,200 comments OSHA has received to date on its proposal, many submissions are highly critical of the standards — frequently citing the financial and administrative burdens they’d place on fire departments — and urge the Labor Department to not press ahead with them. “The standard, as written, would just cripple many volunteer departments out there, and frankly, compromise emergency response in a lot of small communities across the country,” said Ryan Woodward, the chief of legislative and regulatory affairs at the National Volunteer Fire Council. Though DOL stated in its regulatory filing that it has taken care to not design a “one-size-fits-all” policy, critics say that the proposal does not offer nearly enough flexibility to be workable. “Did they make a couple of accommodations? They did. However, it barely scratches the surface,” Woodward said. “Your rural volunteer fire department is still going to have to fulfill 90 percent of the same criteria as the FDNY under this proposed standard.” Further complicating matters, OSHA’s standards don’t directly apply to volunteers, though some states with OSHA-approved safety plans such as New York treat volunteer firefighters akin to career ones and thus could be covered. The issue is on Congress’ radar and has spurred a pair of concerned letters to OSHA — one by House Republicans last month, and an earlier one from a bipartisan group led by Reps. Jared Golden (D-Maine) and Anthony D’Esposito (R-N.Y.). OSHA has responded by twice extending the public comment period, which is currently slated to close July 22, though a final version may not arrive before the end of Biden’s term. GOOD MORNING. It’s Monday, July 8. Welcome back to Morning Shift, your go-to tipsheet on labor and employment-related immigration. Send feedback, tips and exclusives to nniedzwiadek@politico.com and lukenye@politico.com. Follow us on X at @NickNiedz and @Lawrence_Ukenye.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment