Follow Ryan on Twitter. A CONNECTION ACROSS COUNTRIES, GENERATIONS, ERAS, IS GONE. Together we are mourning not only a person, and not necessarily an institution. Queen Elizabeth II was "the rock on which modern Britain was built," said Britain's new Prime Minister Liz Truss , but that doesn't fully explain the outpouring of global emotion. Perhaps we're mourning something about ourselves that we may never fully comprehend. The Queen embodied a lost responsibility of service, a lost art of restraint and constancy in a world that now never rests. Stop and watch this hilarious story from her former bodyguard, about an American walking near Balmoral who had no idea who she was upon meeting her. CHARLES' CHALLENGE — CHOOSING POLITICAL CONTOURS Is it crass or weird to talk about King Charles III's future and that of British monarchy before Elizabeth II is even laid to rest? For many Britons, the answer is yes. If she was merely Elizabeth Windsor, also yes. But in many ways Elizabeth Windsor passed away 70 years ago. She was replaced by the Queen — the institution we all know today, a vessel of a monarchy that outlives her, and which is the subject of debate, including because of the choices and relative unpopularity of her son. The Commonwealth had barely started (in 1949) when Elizabeth became Queen — for 9 out of 10 people alive today , she is the only British monarch they have ever known. As Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who has known the Queen since he was 5, noted: "She was our Queen for almost half of Canada's existence." For many of her former African and Asian colonies, later independent republics, she was their only monarch. Reeling off virtually any statistic or anecdote about her serves to remind us of King Charles' difficult position: Everything about his mother is a comparison he will struggle to separate from. She provided connective tissue to the body politic of many countries; he chose the role of political gadfly. She embodied duty; he embodied torment. The political prince — who has campaigned for decades on environmental, urban and architecture issues — now has to decide when his politicking will help or hinder the monarchy's cause. The Times of India described King Charles this morning as " manically active on a range of topics — though often under the radar." In one sense Charles is suited to the times: He will be The Green King, at one on climate issues with his heir Prince William. But there are risks. While Charles' policy engagement came in the form of letters and speeches — even his own organic food brand — rather than red lines through legislation, the Queen would never have undertaken such actions. Instead, Elizabeth II was "Her Majesty" — above politics and able to defy what Adrian Wooldridge describes as the "down-marketing" of other European royals, who attempted to rebrand royalty as people almost like us, but with castles. King Charles does not have that luxury. The new King is finally His Majesty, but thanks to decades of (sometimes illegal) tabloid scrutiny and his self-generated missteps in marriage and politics, he takes the crown and scepter with less majesty than his mother. And the more he enters into politics, the less majesty there will be. As a monarch without mystery, many people will wonder: What is the point of all this? MONARCHY UNDER SCRUTINY, IN SOME PLACES PRESSURE Constitutional historian Ben Jones predicts a " shock to the system" for those Commonwealth citizens who are now left with a faraway King who, "like any other human being has failings." There are already calls to return crown jewels to India, Africa. Will King Charles resist the temptation to offer a coronation present to the crown's former colonies? Long live the Republic, maybe! While four of the last five prime ministers of Australia have supported the country becoming a republic, it's easier said than done, and a sensitive topic during a period of mourning. The Australian Republican Movement is staying silent until after the funeral, but the direction of travel is clear. In Canada, only 29 percent view King Charles favorably, and only 34 percent want to keep the monarchy. Read Ottawa Playbook to better understand Canadian perspectives. Reality check: Chileans rejected a new constitution Sunday, despite overwhelming support for change. That's timely proof that a population can reject a system without agreeing on what to replace it with. Australians taught themselves that lesson already, in 1999, in a failed republic referendum. BUT FEELINGS CHANGE … Queen Elizabeth was nothing if not influential on those she met and advised. Martin McGuinness, the Northern Irish guerilla turned politician, dedicated much of his life to blowing the monarchy up (literally), including the IRA's 1979 assassination of the Queen's uncle Louis Mountbatten. What a turnaround to see him lead one of her four nations, and welcome her to the island of Ireland in 2011. Even PM Truss, the last politician to meet the Queen, once advocated for the abolition of the monarchy. Marvel here at the condolences of Paul Keating , the former prime minister of Australia and father of the country's republican movement, for which he was reviled by British media as the " Lizard of Oz."
|
No comments:
Post a Comment