Tuesday, June 21, 2022

☀️ Axios Vitals: Hot, hot, hot

Plus: COVID patent deal leaves both sides unhappy | Tuesday, June 21, 2022
 
Axios Open in app View in browser
 
Presented By PhRMA
 
Axios Vitals
By Tina Reed · Jun 21, 2022

☀️ Happy first day of summer, Vitals readers. Today's newsletter is 1,049 words or a 4-minute read.

 
 
1 big thing: Heat is a public health problem
Data: CDC National Center for Health Statistics; Chart: Kavya Beheraj/Axios

Extreme heat may not be as attention-grabbing as calamities like floods or earthquakes, but it's taking a bigger toll on vulnerable populations, Axios' Arielle Dreher reports.

Why it matters: Summers are becoming deadlier as climate change blankets millions in heat waves whose public health consequences were until recently not fully understood.

  • "The problem with heat and drought is that until they get extreme, we don't really see the impact on the landscape that would typically trigger our risk response," said Ashley Ward, senior policy associate at Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University.

The big picture: As Axios' Andrew Freedman writes, extreme heat has broken records from the Southwest to the Plains and Midwest for the past two weeks, contributing to wildfires and severe thunderstorms that knocked out power to hundreds of thousands across the Midwest.

  • Extreme heat that roasted the Upper Midwest and northern Plains is forecast to shift south and southeastward during the week.
  • The National Weather Service is calling the high temperatures "excessive" and "well above average" for this time of year.
  • Temperature records will be in jeopardy in cities such as Atlanta, Nashville, Memphis, Little Rock, and St. Louis during mid-to-late week.

Zoom in: More local health departments are preparing extreme heat plans for residential areas, targeting "heat islands" and directing messaging at the most at-risk locales.

  • Even communities where heat waves or extreme heat traditionally don't pose a threat, like the Pacific Northwest, have also learned the hard way how soaring temperatures can lead to more deaths and hospital visits.

Related: Hundreds of homeless people die from extreme heat

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 
2. Cities may need to redesign for the extreme heat
Illustration of a fan blowing on the sun.

Illustration: Brendan Lynch/Axios

 

The hotter it gets, the less people want to move their bodies outdoors, according to recent research in the International Journal of Biometeorology.

Why it matters: While the finding may seem obvious, it's just one example of the implications extreme heat has on health and wellness — and why experts say cities will need to adapt.

Details: The authors of the study used electric counters to track hourly pedestrian and cyclist traffic on a popular trail in Austin, Texas, looking for the connection between the temperatures and trail use.

  • Pedestrians — at least those in Austin — were most likely to use the trail when the temperature was between 45°F and 81°F with peak use at 63°F. Cyclists were most likely to use the trail when temperatures were between 59°F and 91°F with peak use at 81°F.
  • In summer, pedestrians were more likely to use the trail until temperatures reached 81°F and cyclists were more likely to use the trail until temperatures reached 91°F.
  • Applying two greenhouse gas emissions scenarios and the expected impact on extreme temperatures, the study projected overall trail use would decrease by up to 17% by pedestrians and by up to 5% by cyclists by the mid- to late-century.

What they're saying: As temperatures hit heat extremes more often, cities may need to consider interventions, such as creating "cool corridors" — adding green space, tree canopy or retractable shade structures — to encourage physical activity.

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 
3. Vaccine patent deal leaves both sides unhappy

An agreement to end a long-running fight over intellectual property protections for COVID-19 vaccines isn't sitting well with drugmakers and some of the advocates who had been pressing for reforms, Axios' Adriel Bettelheim writes.

Driving the news: World Trade Organization member nations last week agreed to loosen the IP framework and allow countries to quash restrictions and engage in compulsory licensing of vaccines.

  • The member nations agreed to postpone for six months a decision on whether to do the same for COVID diagnostics and therapeutics.

The big picture: The so-called TRIPS waiver divided wealthy and developing nations for nearly two years, with proponents saying it will help increase vaccine production and deliver doses in the developing world.

  • But vaccine supply began to significantly outpace demand in the time it took to negotiate the deal.
  • Many contend the challenge is less about manufacturing than distributing vaccines to those who most need them in the developing world.

What they're saying: The compromise "largely reiterates developing countries' existing rights to override patents in certain circumstances," per Oxfam, which argued for a broader waiver.

  • The agreement "will do nothing to increase COVID vaccination rates in the developing world, while at the same time setting a harmful precedent for the world's ability to respond to the next pandemic," said the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a trade group.

Our thought bubble: It will take more than waiving patent protections to fix the gaping global divide in access.

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 

A message from PhRMA

Out-of-pocket costs create significant barriers to care
 
 

New data show that 35% of insured Americans spent more on out-of-pocket costs than they could afford in the past month.

The story: Many patients are experiencing an insurance system that isn't working for those who need care.

Learn how insurance is leaving patients exposed to deepening inequities.

 
 
4. How much Medicare could have saved
Illustration of medical pills with half of the capsule created from paper money.

Illustration: Rae Cook/Axios

 

Medicare could have saved up to $3.6 billion in a single year if it were purchasing generic drugs as billionaire businessman Mark Cuban's online pharmacy does, says a research report published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Why it matters: Medicare is overpaying for some generics, the authors said.

Details: The Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company (MCCPDC) launched in January, selling more than 100 generic prescriptions at the cost of ingredients and manufacturing plus a 15% margin, $3 pharmacy dispensing fee and a $5 shipping fee.

  • So the researchers from Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School compared the price of 89 generic drugs sold by the company to the price Medicare paid in 2020.
  • Medicare could have saved up to $3.6 billion, or 37% of total spending, on 77 generic drugs if it purchased generic drugs in the maximum quantity supplied by MCCPDC.

The lower drug prices from a direct-to-consumer model highlight inefficiencies in the current drug supply chain and reimbursement system, which includes wholesalers, pharmacy benefit managers, pharmacies, and insurers.

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 
5. A hospital's fight to save a city

Cover: Flatiron Books

 

"The Desperate Hours: One Hospital's Fight to Save a City on the Pandemic's Front Lines" comes out today.

  • Brenner draws on 200+ interviews for a gripping account of New York-Presbyterian's heroics — with too little federal help — as COVID smothered the city, Axios' Mike Allen writes.
Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 
6. While you were weekending
Illustration of a desk on a beach under a palm tree.

Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

 

💉 Kids under 5 are expected to start getting COVID vaccinations today after CDC director Rochelle Walensky signed off on allowing Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 shots. (Axios)

📈 Uterine cancer is on the rise — expected to displace colorectal cancer by 2040 as the leading cancer among women by 2040 — and doctors aren't sure why. (New York Times)

👉 Black residents either leave or are terminated from training programs at far higher rates than white residents, a STAT News investigation found. (STAT)

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 

A message from PhRMA

Voters want Congress to address health insurance
 
 

According to a new poll, 71% of Americans would like to see Congress focus more on reducing the overall costs of health care coverage such as premiums, deductibles and copays.

The reason: Many believe current health insurance coverage options are confusing and unaffordable.

 
HQ
Like this email style and format?
It's called Smart Brevity®. Over 200 orgs use it — in a tool called Axios HQ — to drive productivity with clearer workplace communications.
 

Axios thanks our partners for supporting our newsletters. If you're interested in advertising, learn more here.
Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content.

Axios, 3100 Clarendon B‌lvd, Suite 1300, Arlington VA 22201
 
You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from Axios.
Change your preferences or unsubscribe here.
 
Was this email forwarded to you?
Sign up now to get Axios in your inbox.
 

Follow Axios on social media:

Axios on Facebook Axios on Twitter Axios on Instagram
 
 
                                             

No comments:

Post a Comment

Louis Navellier’s Top 5 Stocks for 2024

Fellow investor, My brand-new research report,  Top 5 Stocks For 2024 , is ready for you. Click here to downloa...